We Are All One in the Collective Unconscious
Collective Unconscious we are all one as research has shown. instincts ingrained into human DNA. Recognizing this is modern science that all humans share a set shared between all humans. In particular, Humanity is only given .1% of DNA to separate them from the pack. Additionally, 99.9% are found sharing with every other human. The most shocking thing, however, is that scientists only know what a small percentage of DNA does. However, the unknown portion refers to as “Junk DNA.” In the same way that DNA interconnects humanity through innate instincts, could junk DNA code for more intricate instincts?
When the term instinct is mentioned in the general public. Uniquely, it usually refers to a hard-wired response to specific stimuli that are shared by an entire species. The definition of instinct denotes a purely mechanical process, but even scientific minds view themselves separated from the mechanical workings of nature. There’s are reasons why killing a person doesn’t carry nearly the same charges as killing an animal. Consequently, even then, most only really care about killing domesticated animals. So if humans have a higher capacity (supposedly) for consciousness, could all this extra junk DNA connect humanity in aspects of knowledge more elevated than the material world?
Renowned psychologist Carl Jung coined the term “Collective Unconscious,” which describes how all of humanity has an underlying, shared consciousness populated with archetypes. Archetypes are the common ideas spread through all cultures throughout time (like the tree of life or mother nature). Jung attributed the universality of these symbols, causing a shared consciousness that all humans are born. Ideas similar to the universal unconscious are ancient Greece in the dialogues of Socrates, as transcribed by Plato. One theory proposed by Socrates is the theory of forms, in which humans view a world of imperfect things through the perfect ways of those things. One example explaining the theory is the comparison of two logs of wood. Though, for instance, two records may share some similarities, neither log will ever be perfect.
Additionally, when someone says the word log, the brain instantly pictures the perfect form of a log even though a perfect log doesn’t exist. Socrates proposed the theory of ways to explain how the soul exists before life. In particular, the state where the ingraining with a perfect soul is not plausible. Could all of the junk DNA house the collective unconscious, where all perfect forms and archetypes resonate?
Throughout history, there are periods with extreme scientific advancement. Additionally, were so many discoveries happening in such a small amount of time. Just consider the impact of the many great minds of the renaissance like Leonardo Da Vinci and Michelangelo, or the result of inventors of early America like Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison. Even the early nineties had their geniuses like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates (among many others) that shaped technology into what it is today.
Whenever there’s a societal boom of innovation, it’s never the work of one person alone. Many minds seem to unknowingly converge at the same time at the same place and create world-changing innovations. A lot of these people also suggest that sometimes their most significant findings are ones that came to them with little to no effort, and sometimes even on accident. Could all the intense periods of innovation and change throughout human history point to tapping into a collective unconscious?
the idea of a collective unconscious
Even the idea of a collective unconscious has crept its way into the Rolodex of archetypes. Many stories both written in books and shown in tv and movies.
Furthermore, revolving around the idea that humans are like hive-mind or collective consciousness. Similarities, revolving around the design in which every member of the population is the same as one another — for example, comparing humans to ants.
Read here about the Circuits That Dominate the Human Software to find out more on being one Collective Unconscious
The hive-mind archetype pervading pop-culture is a subtle and unplanned reference to the collective unconscious. Humans may sometimes tap into a state of being. For instance, feelings as if they’re only a small part of collective humanity for this reason, which is then reflected through media in the literal sense (hive-mind).
The problem with viewing the collective unconscious as a hive-mind is that it creates a sense of restraint, in the same way, instincts restrain animals from free will. Instead, viewing the collective unconscious from a perspective of interconnectedness. Therefore, humans can connect. Additionally, even society on a level that surpasses the material plane and allows humanity to change the world.
The Hive-Mind almost is an Artificial Technology all active. Development of a DEEP Mind but self-aware to use all the information it’s fed. Check out What google did now! Click here to go read an article on how you are already under control by AI.
Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_unconscious https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-coding_DNA#Junk_DNA https://www.answers.com/Q/How_much_DNA_do_humans_share_with_each_other